Gas station without pumps

2010 June 26

Homework load

Filed under: Uncategorized — gasstationwithoutpumps @ 16:15
Tags: , ,

One problem that teachers end up thinking about a lot is how much homework to assign and whether to include it in the final evaluations of student performance.  In this blog post, I’ll address only the first question—how much to assign, not how to use it.

For college students, there is a fairly simple rule to follow: being a student is a full-time job. For example, on my campus, the standard full-time load is 15 units.  If we assume that a full-time job is 40–45 hours a week of work, then each unit should translate to 2.7–3 hours of work a week.  That work includes attending class (and labs), doing assigned reading, doing term papers, and doing homework.  Our classes are typically 5-unit classes, with 3.5 hours of lecture a week, leaving 9.8–11.5 hours a week for reading, homework, programming assignments, and term papers.

Although this guideline is simple, guessing how much time students take to do the assignments is often difficult.  For example, a simple programming assignment might take the top students in the class only a couple of hours to do an excellent job on, while the bottom students in the class may spend 10–20 hours to get an only partially-functioning program written.  Reading is also highly variable, with college reading speeds seeming to range from about 30 words per minute to 600 words per minute—and some students never bother to do the reading at all. The workload of the course should not be based on the least competent person in the class, who may not be prepared to do the work no matter how much it is watered down, nor should it be based on the top student in class, as tempting as it is to think “well, G— can do it, so it can’t be asking too much”.

The best approach I’ve found is to do the assignments myself, and assume that the students will take about 3 times as long as I do for each assignment.  Getting feedback from the students on how long specific assignments took, and how much time they spent total on the course can also be useful for adjusting the workload to a reasonable level.  For courses with a larger difference in expected ability between teacher and student, a larger ratio may need to be assumed.

Many middle schools and high schools set up their homework expectations based on “preparing students for college”.  One common rule of thumb one hears is that the total homework load should be 10 minutes per grade level per night (so 10 minutes a night for 1st graders and 2 hours a night for high-school seniors, counting 5 nights a week).  Let’s compare that with the college expectation of  40–45 hours a week of work, including classes.  My son’s middle school had the students for 34 hours a week.  That includes lunch, but many students did homework or met with teachers during lunch, and there wasn’t time for them to go elsewhere, so we’ll count that time as part of their work time (if you insist to treating this a free time, reduce the schooling time to 30 hours a week).  A full-time load for the students would thus involve 6–10 hours a week of homework, which comes pretty close to the 80 minutes/night * 5 nights = 6.67 hours/week. The high school my son is attending next year generally has the students for 27.5 hours a week, so a full-time load would mean 12.5 hours of homework a week, or 150 minutes of homework a night.  Of course, many students at that high school are taking 8 courses a year instead of 6, so if we figure a 45-hour week for them, we get 36.25 hours of school and 8.75 hours of homework for 105 minutes a night (pretty close to the 90–120 minutes a week of the rule of thumb).  First through third grades at one of hte local elementary schools has 28.25 hours of school a week, so with the rule-of-thumb homework load, the kids have 29-hour to 30.75-hour work weeks—about a 3/4 time job rather than a full-time job, but certainly enough for 6–9-year-old kids.


  1. This looks really helpful, Kevin–thanks for offering such clear guidelines for parents and teachers. My daughter will be starting in a brand-new charter school next term, and I’d like to offer your advice to the administration, since they and staff are in the midst of putting the schedule, classes, etc., etc. together. As it is an arts school, with four areas of focus (visual, dance, music, drama) and some students will be commuting relatively long distances, the scheduling and homework issues have added complexities–there will be performances, rehearsals, etc. to account for. Best wishes, Tamara in Santa Fe

    Comment by Tamara Lichtenstein — 2010 June 27 @ 08:51 | Reply

    • In a performing-arts curriculum, rehearsals and performances are part of the “school time”, while memorizing lines and practicing music or dance at home are homework.

      Transportation time is a huge time sink, but can’t really be counted as part of the workload on students, just as commuting is not counted as part of the work day. This is one of the challenges for “magnet” programs—in order to get enough students with a particular interest or skill range, they have to have a large “catchment” area that they draw from, which results in a large fraction of the students have huge amounts of time wasted on commuting. The loss due to commuting can easily offset any gains due to program quality.

      Comment by gasstationwithoutpumps — 2010 June 27 @ 11:10 | Reply

  2. Both of my kids would argue that the commute time to the specialized GT magnets they attended were WELL worth the time sink. The opportunities available were simply not available in our neighborhood schools. (Both commuted from 4th-12th grade to these programs.) The daily bus ride actually turned out to be great for socializing, as all the kids on the bus were in the same program and my older S in particular made some long-lasting friendships.

    Comment by Lori Wasserman — 2010 June 28 @ 21:34 | Reply

    • I have no direct experience with this, as our district has no busing (except for special ed) and no magnet programs. We have always been limited to those programs that were within walking or biking distance.
      Since my son is (like me) quite susceptible to motion sickness, a long bus ride would not have been a good option, even if it were available.

      Comment by gasstationwithoutpumps — 2010 June 29 @ 10:07 | Reply

  3. […] For both writing and programming, more time is needed than the short lecture times of college classes.  The typical expectation in engineering classes in college is about 3 hours of out-of-class work for each hour of lecture (the reverse of the typical high school load of  20 minutes at home  for each hour in class).  (See my post on homework load.) […]

    Pingback by Programming and writing « Gas station without pumps — 2010 July 2 @ 10:14 | Reply

  4. […] Homework load […]

    Pingback by 2010 in review « Gas station without pumps — 2011 January 2 @ 12:52 | Reply

  5. […] Homework load […]

    Pingback by Blogoversary « Gas station without pumps — 2011 June 5 @ 10:51 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: