Gas station without pumps

2011 October 10

Discussion of potential conceptual physics texts

In one of the home-schooling mailing lists that I read, the question came up what textbook to use for teaching a gifted 12-year-old physics.  This question is similar to the one I had last June about conceptual physics books (see Conceptual Physics text needed).  I won’t repeat that post (though there were several good suggestions in the comments), but discuss some of the options we looked at.

Paul Hewitt‘s Conceptual Physics Conceptual Physics textbook cover
Used locally by several of the better schools, and frequently recommended on several mailing lists.   We gave up on it because of its snail pace. Ideas that need a paragraph or a page are stretched out to fill a chapter.  It may be a gentle introduction for people who love to have things said very, very slowly, but it was putting us to sleep.
Larry Gonick‘s Cartoon Guide to Physics
Larry Gonick’s books are always fun and the content is usually good. But you can be left believing you understand something without actually being able to apply it.  Get this book, but use something with exercises as well.
James Kakalios‘s The Physics of Superheroes
A fun book for thinking about physics and getting a grounding in Newtonian thinking.  Like Gonick’s book, worth reading, but needs to be supplemented by labs and exercises. (We have the first edition, which has a more boring cover than the second edition.  I don’t know if there is any difference in content).
Richard Feynman‘s Six Easy Pieces
Several of Feynman’s lectures have been collected and are worth reading. Some are too advanced, but “Six Easy Pieces” collects some of the easier-to-understand lectures and presents them well.  Again, they would need exercises and labs.
Science Curriculum Inc’s Force, Motion, and Energy
This is more middle-school than high-school level, but the approach and labs are better than I usually see in 9th grade physics.  This would be an excellent book for a 12-year-old to work through.

There were a couple of other physics books we looked at, but they turned out to be even more boring than Hewitt’s book.  I don’t remember their titles or authors.

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: