Gas station without pumps

2012 April 3

Harvey Mudd College

The NY Times published an article by Katie Hafner, Giving Women the Access Code, which is a mixture of a puff piece for the president of Harvey Mudd College (Maria Klawe) and a discussion of the partial success they’ve had in raising the number of women in their computer science program so that “this year, nearly 40 percent of Harvey Mudd’s computer science degrees will go to women”.  That is still not at the goal of 50%, but it is a lot better than most colleges are doing (32% at CMU, 30% at MIT, 10% at UCSC).

Note: the game-design major at UCSC, which dwarfs the traditional CS program, has almost exactly the same gender ratio as the traditional program.

The article by Hafner attributes the success of getting women to continue in CS at Harvey Mudd largely to a new intro to computer science course intended for students who have not had prior programming experience, taught in Python instead of Java and concentrating on applications of computer science across science.  If that were all it took, UCSC would have much better ratios, as we’ve had CMPS 5P  and BME 60 classes for several years, which look superficially very similar to Harvey Mudd’s “gold” intro to CS. They don’t seem to be resulting in many conversions to CS majors, though.

I think one major difference is that a course in computer science is required at Harvey Mudd, so more students who are initially reluctant to try it end up discovering that they enjoy the thrill of creating their own programs and debugging them.

Another major difference is that Maria Klawe, the president of Harvey Mudd, is herself a computer scientist, and so serves as a very visible role model.  At UCSC, the computer science faculty page lists 37 faculty, including lectures and adjunct faculty, only 4 of whom are women.  Computer engineering is not doing much better with 4 out of 30. Biomolecular Engineering (which is where bioinformatics is taught) has 3 women out of 16 on the faculty page, which is slightly better, but very low for a bio-related science. None of the women in the computer sciences at UCSC are in particularly visible leadership positions.

The faculty gender ratios in computer engineering and computer science used to be much better at UCSC (say 15–20 years ago).  It looks like recent hiring has been almost all male.

Hafner’s article was distributed to the UCSC School of Engineering faculty by one of the (male) computer science professors.  I think it was intended to convey the message that it is possible to do a hell of a lot better than UCSC has been doing on gender ratios in computer science.  It caught my eye both because of my own interest (I’m currently scheduled to teach BME 60 next year and hope to covert a couple of students from biology to bioinformatics), and because Harvey Mudd is one of the colleges that has come up in discussions of places that might be a good fit for my son.


  1. I’m enjoying reading this blog, which I just run across; would like to know who writes it.

    Comment by David Klappholz — 2012 April 4 @ 13:55 | Reply

    • You might want to read my post Privacy of bloggers for an explanation of why I don’t sign these posts with my real name. It’s hardly secret—about half the people who read this blog know me in real life and something like 80% found this blog from an email that had my real name. In any case, anyone who wanted to take the trouble could figure out who I am from the posts and links in the blog itself.

      Comment by gasstationwithoutpumps — 2012 April 4 @ 23:47 | Reply

  2. […] Race, Testing the Politics of LikabilityArthur Sulzberger a putz: New York Times reporter Don McNeilHarvey Mudd College .wp-polls .pollbar { margin: 1px; font-size: 8px; line-height: 10px; height: 10px; […]

    Pingback by Giving Women de Access Code – Theories of Leadership — 2012 April 12 @ 15:41 | Reply

  3. […] Harvey Mudd College ( […]

    Pingback by Keep your Hand up to Get Ahead… « The Dekkers Report… — 2012 June 18 @ 13:02 | Reply

  4. […] than men, and most of the interventions trying to reduce that loss have not been very effective.  (Harvey Mudd has had some success, attributed to various causes.) If the theory put forth by Rampell is valid, what interventions […]

    Pingback by Why few women in engineering? | Gas station without pumps — 2014 March 11 @ 11:33 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: