Gas station without pumps

2016 January 3

Solar lies

Filed under: Uncategorized — gasstationwithoutpumps @ 18:27
Tags: , , , ,

Enphase, who make the microinverters I use and monitor their output, reported to me

Enphase Energy maximizes your solar energy production and keeps you informed about your system. Your monthly energy report shows how your system performed and how much you contributed to offsetting the global carbon footprint.

Week Peak Power Energy Produced
12/01/2015 – 12/07/2015 925 W 24.7 kWh
12/08/2015 – 12/14/2015 887 W 23.3 kWh
12/15/2015 – 12/21/2015 928 W 22.5 kWh
12/22/2015 – 12/28/2015 1.05 kW 26.1 kWh
12/29/2015 – 12/31/2015 873 W 13.4 kWh
December 2015 Total: 110 kWh
Previous Month Total: 140 kWh
Year to Date: 1.00 MWh

For more details on these production results, please visit your Enphase® system.

Your Carbon Offset for this month: 168 lbs

You have offset the equivalent of: 2 Trees

The total energy generated seems correct, but the carbon offset is clearly wrong.  PG&E reports emission factors in the range 0.391–0.641 lbs CO2/kWh (or 0.177–0.291 g/Wh) for their electricity generation, depending on the year.  []
That means that my generating 110kWh reduces CO2 emissions by 43–70.5 lbs (19.5–32kg), not 168 lbs.

Enphase’s computation using 1.53 lbs CO2/kWh is quite high—not worst case (lignite coal is 2.17 lbs CO2/kWh []), but much higher than the US average of 1.222 lbs CO2/kWh used by [].

Of course, household solar energy production in the summer mainly affects peaking, not baseload power generation, and that averages about 0.689551 g/Wh across the US [].  With that number, 110kWh would be 75.85kg CO2 (167 lb), so that is what Enphase is reporting—the largest number that they could conceivably justify.

But in the winter, mid-day is not peak power usage—early evening is in California, so it really isn’t justifiable to use the national, year-round average peaking generator CO2 emissions for California winter solar generation.  The annual non-CO2 emissions for non-baseload power in California is only 1.01887 lbs/kWh  (0.462 g/Wh) [], which is the largest number that Enphase could honestly claim in the summer (probably still high for PG&E, which uses a smaller proportion of fossil fuel generation than most California utilities).

Enphase is not the worst offender in inflating carbon offsets—the “Cool Campus Challenge” at UC had some really ludicrous estimates of how much CO2 would be reduced by various changes in habit. For example, they seemed to assume that turning off a computer monitor when not in use would save 200lbs of CO2 a year, which for PG&E electricity would be 300–500kWh/year, or 36–58W.  But most monitors drop into a power-save mode after being idle for half an hour, taking less than 1W, so a more honest estimate of how much CO2 would be saved is around 15kWh, or 6–10 lbs CO2.  Their estimates of 50lbs of CO2 reduction for unplugging vampire loads was similarly ludicrous—most of the power supplies in my house meet at least Level IV efficiency standards, with “vampire” loads under 0.1W. Unplugging all of them would save maybe 1w, or 3–6 lbs CO2.

I wish that people who provided carbon offset calculations would be more honest about them. It does no one any good to  think that small symbolic gestures do much to reduce their carbon footprint.

One thing that is a little more than symbolic—closing my laptop so that it sleeps reduces its power consumption by 20W, so closing it for 12 hours a day saves 88kWh/year, or about 34–56 lbs of CO2.

But almost anything I do with electricity reduction is mainly symbolic, as my biggest carbon footprint is usually for heating my house (and hot water) with natural gas: about 433 therm/year or 2300 kg CO2 (5100 lbs) [].

I expect this year to make a couple of family trips, for a total flight distance of around 14000km, adding another 2500 kg CO2 this year [] I may do another 2000 km of Amtrak train rides (about 70–90 g/km [European figures for diesel traction from]) for another 140–180 kg CO2.

Even as a bicyclist without a car, transportation contributes a lot to my carbon footprint—more than I expected.


  1. I hate the lies, too. But, I sometimes wonder how much of the frustration is a scientist/engineer/PhD thing, and whether they are effective in advancing the cause. The lies make me question everything, even when I generally support a cause, but I don’t think they work that way for everyone (especially a feel good lie, like “you saved two trees” or 25 children).

    Comment by zb — 2016 January 4 @ 10:26 | Reply

  2. […] planning to buy carbon offset credits for our energy usage this year (see previous estimates in Solar lies).  Nothing for electricity of course, since we had a slight surplus there.  According to […]

    Pingback by Average annual power use | Gas station without pumps — 2016 July 30 @ 00:47 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: