Gas station without pumps

2016 January 16

Smoother I vs V plots for LED

Filed under: freshman design seminar — gasstationwithoutpumps @ 14:30
Tags: , ,

Yesterday I posted I vs V plots for the orange LED WP710A10ND and commented that “one can see the crude quantization of the bad DAC in the FG085 function generator, as banding in the line.”

 

Today I tried to improve the plots by using a 470µF capacitor across the function generator outputs.  Since the FG085 has an approximately 47Ω output impedance (nominally 50Ω, but see FG085 function generator output impedance), a 470µF capacitor would give a low-pass filter with a time constant of about 22ms, or a corner frequency of 7.3Hz.  I was doing a triangle wave sweep with a period of 9 s, so the 256-step DAC makes for about 57 steps/s or 17.6ms/step.  Having a time constant about the same duration means that the steps will be converted into ramps and we’ll avoid most of the quantization artifacts.

WP710A10ND_logI_V

The curves are indeed much smoother in this plot, and lack the obvious steps of previous plots. If I zoom way in on the plots with gnuplot, I can still see some clustering at the steps, but there is a lot of data between the steps.

Interestingly, I can see some hysteresis on the linear plot.

I had two conjectures about the source of the hysteresis:

  • The 32× averaging takes some time, so the voltage and current measurements are not precisely synchronized, and the current-before-voltage measurement would give different systematic errors depending whether the voltage and current were rising or falling.
  • The properties of the LED change because of heating and cooling effects.  The upward leg has a cooler LED than the downward leg.

Note that these two hypotheses are distinguishable by experiment.  If I slow down the ramps, then the time discrepancy results in smaller voltage and current discrepancies, and the effect should diminish.  But the LED gets hotter if it is run at maximum current for longer, so the thermal effect should be greater.

I tried using a 33s period instead of a 9s period, and the two curves moved further apart (from about 0.4mA to 0.6mA at near the max separation), consistent with the thermal theory, but not the time-bias theory.  (I leaned toward the thermal theory initially anyway, since the two curves are further apart than one step of the DAC in the FG085.)

The hysteresis makes it clear why manufacturers don’t try to specify the I-vs-V characteristics very precisely—not only can there be variation from component to component, but the parameters are temperature dependent.

3 Comments »

  1. The first diagram appears to have some issue on both Chrome and Edge.

    Comment by prevailingtech — 2016 January 16 @ 15:09 | Reply

    • It was failing for me also. I updated the post deleting and reselecting the image (not even uploading it again). It seems to be working for me now. I hope it is for the readers also.

      Comment by gasstationwithoutpumps — 2016 January 16 @ 15:29 | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: