I attended the season announcement party for Santa Cruz Shakespeare tonight, at which they announced their line up for the season. They really need a blockbuster season this year, to help pay for the $1,000,000 construction of the new “Grove at Delaveaga Park” performance space, for which they have a 2-year lease. Naturally, they picked very well known and popular plays:
- Midsummer Night’s Dream
For the Fringe play by the interns (which is often as good or better than the plays by the professional actors, except for the inevitable intern who can’t project well enough for outdoor theater—but they’ve had that problem sometimes with professional actors), they chose a less well-known play:
Virginia Woolf’s Orlando, adapted as a play by Sarah Ruhl.
According to the play’s web site, it was first performed in 2010, so it is a relatively recent work.
Mike Ryan is continuing the practice of gender-balanced casting, which should work well for the couples in Midsummer Night’s Dream—that play is nearly gender-balanced as is.
For Hamlet, the title role will be played by a woman. I don’t know whether she will be “Princess of Denmark” or whether she will be playing a male role. I think that Hamlet could be a female role, though the parts of the plot involving Ophelia would change somewhat in tone. If Hamlet becomes a female role, what about Horatio? Also, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern could be male, female, or one of each, equally plausibly. I’m curious to see how they work this out.
I’ve seen an all-female production of Hamlet in Santa Cruz (April 2012, produced by San Francisco State University, and presented by Jewel Theatre), in which the roles retained their original gender, despite an all-female cast—it was a good production, particularly for student work. I suspect that SSC will try a more challenging adaptation, in which some of the roles change gender, rather than cross-casting the actors.
Of course, the point of having this season-announcement party for “Producer’s Circle” donors was to ask people to give to the capital campaign, in addition to their annual giving for the operating expenses. They’ve raised about 67% of what they need, but that still leaves about $330,000 to raise in the next month or two. I think that they’ll be going public with the capital campaign soon, once they’ve got a few more big donors to make the remaining “ask” seem more feasible.
They are getting a no-interest loan, I believe, backed by donor pledges, so that they can start construction as soon as the money is promised. The idea is that people can pledge money to be given over the next three years, and the loan makes the money available immediately for the upfront construction costs. My wife and I have already donated to the 2016 budget and were planning to donate to the 2017 budget, and we’ll probably give something to the capital campaign, but we haven’t figured out how much yet.
The planning permits are approved, I believe, so they are ready to start work on the site as soon as the money is available. They had planning documents at the party, and I spent some time leafing through them. They look pretty good, but it doesn’t seem like there will be any aisle lighting (though I supposed they could add non-permanent rope lights or equivalents). There wasn’t aisle lighting at the Festival Glen either, and its lack did not seem to cause any problems.
They’re starting their season a little later this year (July 12), with the hope that the delayed start will give them enough time to finish building everything.